data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf78/eaf7843dc6b187074af63cc41ac4d31c5d6f51d3" alt=""
Fayyum Portrait
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab314/ab314d50bc6fa78e39f02423f2179275fcf9a984" alt=""
Hugo Van der Goes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15df7/15df7af77554f316b2321e520f674dd64b07e467" alt=""
Lucian Freud
I know, Lucian Freud is like whoa. Every year I have a student who is super talented and will do a copy of a Freud painting that just is amazing and better than I could. Lately, I have been
looking at Hugo Van der Goes -- for me there is a density there that is like the same as Freud, just blended and smoothed and softened. I also like how sometimes you see these type of portraits on unframed, odd-shaped wood panels (maybe parts of an altar or somesuch) -- so the very "realness" of the illusion of the flesh contrasts with the very obvious object-ness of the support. Same with the Roman Fayum mummy portraits.
No comments:
Post a Comment